I was devouring
an outrageously large cheese burger and polishing off a pint of the local porter when the bartender asked if I wanted another. I told her that although I would love another porter, I didn't think I could afford the calories. She then suggested, that if I wanted another dark beer I should try their stout, as stout beer has fewer calories than most other (non-light) domestic beers. Not believing that a stout could actually function as a healthy choice, but not wanting to discredit her advice, I ordered one. Then after returning to Madison, I got online and learned that Guinness Stout has only 125 calories. Sometimes 15, 30, and even 50 fewer than other beers. By god she was right! And then I toasted a Guinness to the knowledge and wisdom of my bartender.I tell this story because recently I have been living a bit too cleanly for my own good. Since I started this birkyness training, officially about two months ago, I have watched closely what I eat and have only had a couple of beers and a few glasses of wine. My wife recently showed me LIVESTRONG.com, a website that promotes a healthy and active lifestyle, and more importantly allows me to track everything I put into my body. Basically it tells me how many calories I can consume in a day (2074), subtracts the calories I digest, and adds the calories I burn. Theoretically if I consume less than my allowed intake, I lose weight.
Last night we grilled up some fresh steelhead, complimenting it with sweet potatoes and asparagus. Knowing that I had two active days in a row, knowing I had watched my calorie intake all day, I went to livestrong, and typed in Guinness. There was the beautiful number: 125 calories. I poured a glass, admired its bold texture, and toasted to healthy choices. And then later, after dinner, by the fire pit, I toasted another. Calories be damned! The Birkie is still ten months away!
Perhaps cut back on the portions and enjoy more beer? :)
ReplyDelete